Avslutta saker for Efta-domstolen og EU-domstolen

Oversyn over saker som Noreg har vore involvert i sidan 2003.

Saker for EFTA-domstolen 

  • E-9/14: Proceedings  concerning Otto Kaufmann AG
  • E-19/13 Konkurrenten.no AS v. EFTA Surveillance Authority
  • E-26/13: Íslenska  ríkið v Atli Gunnarsson
  • E-21/13: The  Federation Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) v EFTA  Surveillance Authority
  • E-3/13 og E-20/13 Fred. Olsen and Others v the Norwegian State
  • E-13/13: EFTA  Surveillance Authority v. Norway
  • E-9/13 EFTA Surveillance Authority v. Norway
  • E-15/12: Jan Anfinn Wahl v the Icelandic State
  • E-2/12: HOB-vín ehf. v  Áfengis- og tóbaksverslun ríkisins
  • E-1/12 Den norske forleggerforening v. EFTA Surveillance Authority
  • E-19/11: Vín Trío ehf. v. Íslenska ríkinu
  • E-16/11: EFTA  Surveillance Authority v. Iceland (ICESAVE). Se      pressemelding om saka og det norske innlegget     
  • E-10/11 og 11/11 Hurtigruten ASA, The Kingdom of Norway v EFTA Surveillance Authority
  • E-9/11: EFTA Surveillance Authority v the Government of the Kingdom of Norway
  • E-7/11: Grund, elli- og hjúkrunarheimili v Lyfjastofnun
  • E-5/11: EFTA Surveillance Authority v the Government of the Kingdom of Norway
  • E-2/11: STX Norway Offshore AS m.fl. v Staten v /Tariffnemnda      
  • E-18/10: EFTA Surveillance Authority v the Government of the Kingdom of Norway
  • E-15/10 Posten Norge AS vs. EFTA Surveillance Authority
  • E-14/10: Konkurrenten.no AS v EFTA Surveillance Authority
  • E-12/10: EFTA Surveillance Authority v The Republic of Iceland
  • E-1/10: Periscopus AS v. Oslo Børs ASA og Erik Must AS. (Prejudisiell framlegging frå Oslo Tingrett. Spørsmål om tolking av Europaparlaments- og Rådsdirektiv 2004/25/EF om overtakingstilbod.)
  • E-2/10: Þór Kolbeinsson v the Icelandic State (Direktivene 89/391/EØF og 92/57/EØF om arbeidstakernes sikkerhet og helse, samt spørsmål om vilkårene for statlig erstatningsansvar etter EØS-retten ved mangelfull gjennomføring av rettsakter).
  • E-6/08: EFTA Surveillance Authority v the Kingdom of Norway (direktiv 2002/91/EF om energieffektivitet i bygningar)
  • E-10/10: EFTA Surveillance Authority v the Government of the Kingdom of Norway. (Traktatbruddssak for Efta-domstolen. Manglande gjennomføring av yrkeskvalifikasjonedirektivet (2005/36/EF).
  • E-11/07 and E-1/08: Olga Rindal and Therese Slinning v Staten v/Dispensasjons - og klagenemnda for bidrag til behandling i utlandet
  • E-9/07 and E-10/07: L'Oréal Norge AS v Aarskog Per AS and Others and Smart Club Norge
  • E-8/07: Celina Nguyen v Staten v/Justis- og politidepartementet
  • E-7/07: Seabrokers v Staten v/Skattedirektoratet
  • E-5/07: Private Barnehagers Landsforbund v EFTA Surveillance Authority
  • E-2/07: EFTA Surveillance Authority v Norway
  • E-1/07: Request for an Advisory Opinion from Fürstliches Landgericht in criminal proceedings
  • E-4/06: KLM Royal Dutch Airlines v Staten v/Finansdepartementet
  • E-3/06: Ladbrokes Ltd. v The Government of Norway, Ministry of Culture and Church Affairs and Ministry of Agriculture and Food
  • E-2/06: EFTA Surveillance Authority v the Kingdom of Norway (Heimfallsaka)
  • E-1/06: EFTA Surveillance Authority v the Kingdom of Norway (Spelmonopolsaka)
  • E-3/05: EFTA Surveillance Authority v The Kingdom of Norway
  • E-1/05: EFTA Surveillance Authority v Norway
    E-9/04: The Bankers’ and Securities Dealers’ Association of Iceland v EFTA Surveillance Authority
  • E-5/04, E-6/04, and E-7/04: Fesil ASA and Finnfjord Smelteverk AS (Case E-5/04), Prosessindustriens Landsforening and others (Case E-6/04), The Kingdom of Norway (Case E-7/04) v EFTA Surveillance Authority
  • E-4/04: Pedicel AS v Sosial- og helsedirektoratet
  • E-3/04: Tsomakas Athanasios and Others with Odfjell ASA as an accessory intervener v The Norwegian State
  • E-1/04: Fokus Bank ASA v The Norwegian State, represented by Skattedirektoratet (the Directorate of Taxes)
  • E-4/03: EFTA Surveillance Authority v Norway 

Sakene er lagt ut på EFTA-domstolen si heimeside.

Saker for EU-domstolen 

  • C-533/13 (AKT)
  • C-440/13 (Croce Amica One Italia)
  • C-396/13 (Sähköalojen ammattiliitto ry)
  • C-358/13 (D.)
  • C-362/13, C-363/13 og  C-407/13 (Fiamingo and Others)
  • C-573/12 (Ålands vindkraft)
  • C-522/12 (Isbir)
  • C-46/12 (L. N.  v Styrelsen for Videregående Uddannelser og Uddannelsesstøtte)
  • C-48/11 A  (Veronsaajien oikeudenvalvontayksikkö v A Oy)
  • C-122/10 (Ving Sverige)
  • C-366/10 (The Air Transport Association of America e.a)
  • C-43/10 (Nomarchiaki Aftodioikisi Aitoloakarnanias and Others v Ypourgos Perivallontos, Chorotaxias kai Dimosion ergon and Others)
  • C-542/09 (Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of the Netherlands).
  • Case-245/09 (Omalet)
  • Joined cases C-447/08 and C-448/08 (Sjöberg and Others)
  • C-258/08 (Ladbrokes Betting & Gaming et Ladbrokes International)
  • C-203/08 (Sporting Exchange)
  • Case C-46/08 (Carmen Media Group Ltd)
  • Joined cases C-316/07, C-358/07 to C-360/07, C-409/07 and C-410/07 (Markus Stoss and Others)
  • C-409/06 (Winner Wetten)
  • C-433/05: Sandstrøm
  • C-19/08 (Petrosian m.fl.)
  • C-319/07 (Specialarbejderforbundet i Danmark (SID) mot Kommisjonen for De Europeiske Fellesskaber, Kongeriket Danmark og Kongeriket Norge)
  • C-208/07 (von Chamier-Glisczinski)
  • C-169/07 (Hartlauer Handelsgesellschaft)
  • C-42/07 (Liga Portuguesa de Futebol Profissional et Baw International)
  • C-452/06 (Synthon)
  • C-436/06 (Dirk Rüffert)
  • C-14/06 og 295/06 (deca-BDE)
  • C-438/05 (Viking Line)
  • C-370/05 (Festersen)
  • C-341/05 (Laval)
  • C-50/05 (Nikula)
  • C-142/05 (Mickelsson et Roos)
  • C-456/04 (Agip Petroli)
  • C-170/04 (Rosengren)
  • C-573/03 (Candolin m.fl)
  • C-296/03 (GlaxoSmithKline)
  • C-245/03 (Eduardo Vieira mod Kommisjonen)
  • C-207/03 og C-252/03 (Novartis m.fl.)
  • C-17/03 (VEMW m.fl.)